Ghostbusters (2016) - Film Review
Starring: Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones & Chris Hemsworth
Screenplay: Katie Dippold & Paul Feig
Directed By: Paul Feig
Certificate: 12
Usually
the hardest part of writing these reviews is finding enough
background information and context to introduce what it is I'm
reviewing, and some are easier than others. But with 2016's
Ghostbusters, I could
genuinely write a thesis about everything surrounding the release of
this film. By the time the first trailer debuted online, a full-on
hate campaign was launched against this film on a scale that no one
had ever seen before. While the trailers set barely anyone's hopes
high for the film, all sorts of abuse was thrown at the cast and
crew, with Leslie Jones even having to temporarily leave Twitter
because of so many internet trolls. The trailers certainly didn't
leave me looking forward to the film, but I can categorically say
that the majority of hatred towards it has been bone-dead stupid
since day one. If people didn't like the film, then that's fine –
it's their choice, but for some people to organise down-vote
campaigns against its promotional material, abuse the creative team
behind it, and even for a certain number of people to hurl racist and
sexist hate at the cast … that is just sick. I'll talk more about
the backlash later, but Ghostbusters brought
out the absolute worst in a lot of people online, with consensus
towards the film seemingly divided into those who liked it, those who
think it's decent, and those who think it's an abomination. As for
me, well let's take a look...
Dr.
Erin Gilbert is a professor of physics at the Columbia University.
She finds her job under threat when her old friend and colleague Abby
Yates publishes a book they both wrote about their investigations
into the paranormal. Going to see Abby to bring the book out of
circulation, she finds herself joining a ghost-hunt with Abby and her
own colleague, Jillian Holtzmann. When the trio make contact with a
ghost, Erin finds her belief in the paranormal renewed. Together with
their dim but handsome receptionist Kevin, and subway station worker
Patty Tolan, the group establishes themselves in the city to capture
and study the ghosts.
In
order to prove to the people like me who were still unsure as to
whether this film would turn out passable or not, Ghostbusters
really needed to win them over within minutes of starting by
hitting hard and heavy with the laughs. Unfortunately, it just didn't
do that. It just takes too long for the film to get going and really
show what it can do. For the first forty minutes of the film, the
audience has to sit through its weakest point and endure often flat,
unfunny and out-of-place jokes. Examples of this include Abby making
THREE very questionable and cringe-worthy jokes about soup, as well
as Erin and Holtzmann awkwardly and randomly dancing in their new base
of operations. It genuinely ended up taking me about ten to fifteen
minutes before I even smiled, and about double that time before the
film reached its first laugh.
It's
a shame because by the time characters like Patty and Kevin show up
to join the team, then the new Ghostbusters really start to gel. But
by this point, it's entirely possible that those who were unsure
about the film give up on it and either join the bullies online or
just move on. Still, because I didn't give up on it, I was very happy
to find that the second and third acts of the film are a distinct
improvement from the first act. It's at this point where the new team
have all their equipment ready, an established base and car etc. The
pay-off is much better than the set-up and once they get more to chew
on, the chemistry between each of the cast really starts to show
itself, and everyone works and interacts with each other really well.
It's
of great benefit to Ghostbusters that each of our new
main characters prove themselves to be likeable and enjoyable to
watch. Though they may at first be let down by cringe-worthy moments
of comedy, they too fill their potential as the film goes on. Abby
and Erin make for a great pairing and both Melissa McCarthy and
Kristen Wiig manage to convince me that their characters do share a
years-long friendship. It also makes for a really great moment when
Erin finally starts investigating the paranormal with Abby again,
abandoning her job as a university physics professor. If there's one
character that probably steals the award for being most memorable, it
would probably be Patty. For a lot of the time, because she's much
more down to Earth compared to the other three, Patty ends up acting
as something of a bridge between the team and the viewing audience,
simplifying a lot of the film's science mumbo-jumbo. Similar to how
Erin was fleshed out thanks to a backstory involving her repeatedly
seeing a ghost as a child, Patty also has an interesting backstory as
well, involving working in a subway station as well as being a local
history expert. While Holtzmann doesn't get quite the same level of
development, she almost gets away with it as she's definitely the
standout amongst the four with her eccentricities and unconventional
approach to her work. Not to mention, in the third act Holtzmann gets
legitimately some of the best action sequences of the entire film.
Not
every character gets as much justice from the script, as we're given
a very bland and forgettable villain that even the writers drop
halfway through. Our villain gets so little screen-time that his
motives and plan are something I'm even having trouble remembering
what they were. As I've said, the character is literally so flat that
the writers drop him halfway through the film and have his “spirit”
form inhabit Chris Hemsworth's character instead.
On
a writing level, the biggest problem with this reboot of Ghostbusters
is that it lacks an identity and doesn't entirely know what
it wants to be. Similarly to last year's Star Wars: The Force
Awakens, this new Ghostbusters doesn't seem
sure if it wants to be a sequel to the original two films, a remake
or a reboot. I say this because the main cast that are still alive
from the original Ghostbusters make cameo appearances
in the film. Now I assumed that they were reprising their original
characters, but then Bill Murray shows up as a paranormal debunker
and Sigourney Weaver as Holtzmann's mentor, so is this a reboot
instead? Is that why events thirty years ago seem to have been
forgotten, despite being brought up in the trailer? If so why does
the taxi driver that Dan Akroyd is playing seem to know so much about
the ghosts, and is Ernie Hudson playing Winston Zeddemore again?
There are probably simple answers to all these questions in the film,
but I'm really having trouble finding them and this is something that
could be so easily sorted out.
As
for how the film looked, I found its visual style to be impressive
and one that marks a clear change from the original films. The
direction is also one of the few definite improvements from Paul
Feig's previous film, Spy. While the original films
look terrific and still certainly hold up today, I enjoyed the new
approach at making Ghostbusters feel big and cinematic.
The effects used to create the ghosts are much more cartoon-y, and
unlike most of the internet, I enjoyed this style. It felt as though
Ghostbusters was embracing its wacky and mad side
rather than shying away from it. I even liked the way the film was
lit – it set it aside from most other blockbuster films and it
somehow felt warmer than its contemporaries.
In
conclusion, 2016's Ghostbusters is far from the
abomination many people would have you believe, but at the same time,
I can't quite call it good. It's irritating if anything because this
film is on the cusp of something that I can call good cinema, but
isn't quite there. It has the looks and most of the characters
nailed, but at the same time lacks an identity and takes too long to
get going. It doesn't best the original films, but it was never going
to and it doesn't try to. One thing for certain is that it did NOT
deserve the toxic reception it received. It's just an OK film and
shouldn't have had to deal with backlash on that ridiculous scale –
but then again, no film ever does.
Ghostbusters
6/10
Comments
Post a Comment