Diana (2013) - Film Review
Starring: Naomi Watts & Naveen Andrews
Screenplay: Stephen Jeffreys
Directed By: Oliver Hirschbiegel
Certificate: 12
In
Britain, we’ve seen many films that focus on the monarchy and their families, ranging from The
King’s Speech,
The Queen
and The
Madness of King George.
Inevitably, we were going to end up getting a film about arguably one
of the most loved women ever to walk the Earth: Princess Diana. Like
The Queen,
Diana
details
events that happened when either I wasn’t born, or I was too young
to remember them, so I'm no expert in each film's events. But the crucial difference between the two, is that
The Queen
explains
many details I might not have previously known, while Diana
doesn’t even have the courtesy to bother.
Diana
follows the last two years of Princess Diana’s life, the
events that took place, her relationships and the events that led up
to her tragic death in 1997. My personal knowledge of the Princess
Diana’s life is average at best, especially considering the fact
that Diana sadly died two years before I was born. However there are
things that I do know about her, such as her children, her
ex-husband, her relationship with the press, and how she died. But I'm no expert, and in the future, there
will be people watching this film, and will know even less than I do.
However, before watching Diana, you need to make sure that you know nearly
EVERY aspect of the Princess’s life. That is no joke. The film does
nothing to explain anything that you might not know. Going into this
film, I didn't even know about Diana's affair with heart surgeon
Hasnat Khan, and for the first twenty minutes he was on screen, I
did not know who he was, or why he belonged in this film. However,
the absolute low-point of the film, is when it doesn’t even bother
to tell us how Diana died. Again, that isn’t a joke. Yes, it’s
true that nearly everyone knows how she died, but relying on your
audience for real-life knowledge of events in your film is just lazy.
While I wasn't exactly expecting the tragic car crash to be
recreated, you at least needed another character to explain verbally
what happened. Instead, Diana is there one minute and simply gone the
next.
If there is anything salvageable in this train-wreck of a film, its Naomi
Watts' portrayal of Princess Diana. You can definitely tell that Naomi has put a great deal of
effort into the role here, as she gets the Princess’s mannerisms
and speech down to a tee. However, this great performance crumbles in
the moments that Diana shares with Hasnat, as there is no chemistry
at all between the two; and the terribly-written dialogue they share
is honestly painful to watch.
However,
Naomi Watts' decent performance here is just wasted on the character
that she’s playing. Diana in this film, is not the Princess Diana
that everybody loved. The real Diana was one of the most loved women
on Earth for a reason. However, the Diana that we see in this film,
is nothing like her. Her motives and goals literally
change from scene to scene. She constantly commits
selfish actions towards others, and either never has to face the
consequences of these actions, or she just ends up not caring. Some
of her actions towards Hasnat are just horrible, and the two are
constantly yo-yoing between being in and out of a relationship
throughout the entire film. I’ve got very little to say about
Hasnat Khan, because, like Diana, he’s been given little to no
personality. Again, in the scenes on his own, Naveen Andrews does a
decent job, but he spends the overwhelming majority of his screen
time with Naomi Watts, and the two just don't convincingly portray a couple in love. I might have
had more to say about his character if the film had bothered to give
him a personality, or explain who he is, because, once again, before watching this
film, I had literally never heard of him.
With a budget of just under $15,000,000, Diana is a fairly low-budget film. While tons of amazing films have
been created on even smaller budgets, the cast and
production values are terrible here. The use of colour varies very little, as the picture looks lifeless and dull
nearly all the time, despite some wonderful locations. The colours and poor-looking sets make this
feature-length film look like an insipid TV docudrama. This isn’t
helped by the lacklustre direction from Oliver Hirschbiegel. At the
start, the direction looks promising, but ten minutes in, the direction
is either flat, clumsy or uninspiring. I’m honestly surprised considering the fantastic work that
Oliver Hirschbiegel did on Downfall almost a decade
ago. The cast and characters fare no better either. There are
literally only two noteworthy characters here, and even they aren’t
very deep or interesting: Diana and Hasnat. Although there are other characters present, they’re not even
worth calling supporting cast members, such as the
young Prince Harry and William, Diana’s children. Throughout the
film, Diana goes on about wanting the best for her children, but they
only appear in a scene that lasts about twenty seconds, and during
this scene, there is no meaningful interaction between them. Simply put, the cast is smaller than a microbe, and it’s
a problem when you consider how many people Diana loved, and how many people loved her in return.
Diana has a run time of nearly two hours and
this two hours is torturous to sit and watch. The purpose of Diana
seems to be to tell you a forbidden love story. Whilst there’s
nothing wrong with a forbidden love story, it doesn’t and can’t
work here, because the two lead characters are either bland or unlikeable. This film could have been so much better if it had focused on something else in the last two years
of Diana’s life. The film could have instead focused on the
relationship between Diana and the media. Depending on how it was
handled, this could prove controversial, but so much better, and would have still been a relevant topic
today, given the corruption that we still find in the media. In the
film that we got, we see tiny glimpses of this, but not to the extent
that it is sold in the trailers and the tiny scale of this film stops
it being noteworthy or relevant.
If you haven't yet gathered, Diana is an absolutely terrible film, with its only strength being the decent acting from Naomi Watts and
Naveen Andrews. However, the oh-so-many cracks appear when the
portrayal of the forbidden relationship is one where you'll struggle
not to laugh, relying on the audience knowing EVERYTHING about Diana,
stars a minuscule cast and features shoddy
direction in an incredibly boring film. Put in its simplest form
Diana is a waste of time, that should have been so, so much
better. However, the only way you'd salvage something good from this
is if you scrapped this and started again from scratch.
Diana
1/10
Comments
Post a Comment